OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Haaland courts moderates during tense confirmation hearing | GOP’s Westerman looks to take on Democrats on climate change | White House urges passage of House public lands package

HAPPY TUESDAY! Welcome to Overnight Energy, The Hill’s roundup of the latest energy and environment news. Please send tips and comments to Rebecca Beitsch at [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter: @rebeccabeitsch. Reach Rachel Frazin at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter: @RachelFrazin.

Sign up for our newsletter and others HERE

 

HAAL-IN ON HAALAND

Setting the stage… Just as Rep. Deb HaalandDeb HaalandImage of Deb Haaland projected onto Interior Dept building calling for her confirmation OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Haaland to say fossil fuels will ‘play a major role,’ but climate must be addressed |  Biden administration supports court’s restrictions for biofuel exemptions | Republican senators take aim at Paris agreement with new legislation Haaland: Fossil fuels will ‘play a major role,’ but climate must be addressed MORE (D-N.M.), President BidenJoe BidenTikTok users spread conspiracy that Texas snow was manufactured by the government The problem with a one-size-fits-all federal minimum wage hike Throwing money at Central America will not curb illegal migration MORE‘s Interior secretary pick, was set to testify before the Senate, former Sens. Tom UdallTom UdallSenate approves waiver for Biden’s Pentagon nominee Senate swears-in six new lawmakers as 117th Congress convenes We can achieve our democratic ideals now by passing the For the People Act MORE (D-N.M.) and Mark UdallMark Emery UdallHickenlooper ousts Gardner in Colorado, handing Democrats vital pickup Live updates: Democrats fight to take control of the Senate The 10 Senate seats most likely to flip MORE (D-Colo.) warned that any accusations of political radicalism were “motivated by something other than her record.”

The two argued that Haaland’s record on environmental issues is typical of a Democratic member of congress from a western state and that they had similar records in Congress that would be unlikely to prevent their confirmation.

“Rep. Haaland’s nomination is both historic and long overdue. If confirmed, she would be the first Native American Cabinet member,” the two former senators wrote.

Read more on the op-ed here

Courting the moderates… Interior Secretary nominee Haaland sought to court moderates while facing tough questions during her confirmation hearing on Tuesday. 

Haaland, a progressive House Democrat from New Mexico who has expressed support for the Green New Deal and opposition to a controversial oil and gas extraction method called fracking, emphasized her bipartisan record while making the case for her confirmation. 

She was introduced by Rep. Don YoungDonald (Don) Edwin YoungHaaland: Fossil fuels will ‘play a major role,’ but climate must be addressed House Republicans who didn’t sign onto the Texas lawsuit Five Republicans vote for bill to decriminalize marijuana MORE (R-Alaska), who noted that he disagreed with her on fossil fuels but stressed that “she will listen to you.”

The nominee faced forceful opposition from Republicans who questioned Haaland on fracking, fossil fuels and a tweet in which she said that Republicans don’t believe in science. 

Her main point: Haaland also repeatedly noted, while answering questions on her fossil fuel stances, that she will be implementing President Biden’s agenda, not her own. 

In her own opening statement, Haaland stressed finding a “balance” between fossil fuels and fighting climate change. 

“There’s no question that fossil energy does and will continue to play a major role in America for years to come. I know how important oil and gas revenues are to fund critical services,” her prepared statement said. 

“But we must also recognize that the energy industry is innovating, and our climate challenge must be addressed,” Haaland added. 

She said during the hearing that if confirmed, her top priorities will be appreciating career employees, promoting clean energy and clean energy jobs and working on broadband internet and missing and murdered indigenous women in Indian Country. 

Read more on the hearing here.

TALKING TREES, 1 TRILLION AT A TIME

Rep. Bruce WestermanBruce Eugene WestermanGOP leaders on three committees push Pelosi on stimulus markups GOP attacks Democrats for allowing Moore to vote after positive COVID test Moore to appear in House for Speaker’s vote after testing positive for COVID-19 MORE (Ark.), the new top Republican on the House Natural Resources Committee, is emphasizing the planting of trees as part of a nature-based approach to climate change, an issue that is likely to be divisive as Democrats and the Biden administration look to take major steps to reduce U.S. emissions.

Republicans have been on defense over climate change in some respects — Democrats have slammed them as a party standing against science, an argument that appeared to help the party make gains among suburban voters as Democrats gained seats in the 2018 midterm elections and the White House in 2020.

Westerman wants Republicans to have a positive agenda to counter Democrats, even as the GOP also readies familiar arguments that President Biden’s climate change policies such as revoking the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline and suspending new leases for drilling on federal lands would harm the economy.

“I think we’ll see a good cross-section of legislation that’s aimed at sequestering carbon,” Westerman said of the committee this session.

Read more on our sit down with Westernman here.  

 

ONE BILL LONG BUT EIGHT BILLS DEEP

The White House released a policy statement on Tuesday saying the administration “strongly supports” a House package aimed at protecting lands and waters in Arizona, Colorado, California and Washington state.  

The legislation, called the Protecting America’s Wilderness and Public Lands Act, combined eight bills that have previously been introduced. It is expected to receive a House vote this week. 

Altogether, the legislation would provide extra protection to about 1.5 million acres of public lands by designating them as wilderness, preventing new uranium mining on about a million acres near the Grand Canyon and preserving 1,000 river miles by adding them to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, according to the Natural Resources Committee.

The White House statement said the bill “puts in place protections for some of our nation’s most iconic natural and cultural resources and safeguards recreational opportunities for the benefit of current and future generations, while creating jobs and investing in the recreation economy.”

Read more about the legislation here

 

ON TAP TOMORROW:

-The Haaland vetting will go into Day 2 with the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

-The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will hold a hearing titled “Building Back Better: Investing in Transportation while Addressing Climate Change, Improving Equity, and Fostering Economic Growth and Innovation.”

 

WHAT WE’RE READING:

As Cities Grapple With Climate Change, Gas Utilities Fight To Stay In Business, NPR reports

Mills expresses ‘grave concern’ over plans to protect North Atlantic right whales, The Portland Press Herald reports

Annapolis sues 26 oil and gas companies for their role in contributing to climate change, The Capital Gazette reports

 

ICYMI:Stories from Tuesday…

GOP’s Westerman looks to take on Democrats on climate change

Haaland faces contentious confirmation fight

Three threatened giraffes electrocuted in Kenya

Haaland courts moderates during tense confirmation hearing

Udalls: Haaland criticism motivated ‘by something other than her record

White House urges passage of House public lands package

Four board members of Texas electric grid operator to resign

 

FROM THE HILL’S OPINION PAGES:

Without planning, climate change will bring more Texas-style blackouts, writes Romany Webb, an associate research scholar at Columbia Law School, and Michael Panfil, director of federal energy policy and a senior attorney at Environmental Defense Fund.

Source Article

Next Post

We put our spendthrift neighbors in touch with our financial adviser. They called her ‘lousy.’ So how come WE are the ones who retired early?

Wed Feb 24 , 2021
My husband and I retired early. We were very frugal. Friends called us cheap. We prefer thrifty or frugal. We had no children, they had three kids; we rarely took vacations, they vacationed every year. Who deserves an annual vacation? There’s a reason why we retired early. We always paid […]

You May Like